FRIDAY: HESED-TIKKUN CHATZOT תקון חצות – LESSON WITH RAV MICHAEL LAITMAN

READING: between after midnight and sunrise of Friday

Baal HaSulam. Preface to the Wisdom of Kabbalah, item 117

Part 2:

Baal HaSulam. Preface to the Wisdom of Kabbalah. #117

https://kabbalahmedia.info/sources/kB3eD83I

Reading item #117 (0:20) “Thus we have learned how the world of Nekudim was imprinted from the world of AK..” twice

1. S. (04:33) Maybe a technical question, he writes here in the beginning that similarly the fifth Partzuf of AK wasn’t printed, isn’t that BON, the fifth Partzuf of AK , why’s he calling it the new?

R. It is according to their order of emergence.

2. S. (05:02) Maybe it’s too early to ask, but what makes the world of Atzilut, what distinguishes or differentiates it as the world of correction and so forth?

R. Because indeed it is the world of correction because all the vessels that were broken in the Gadlut in the world of Nekudim, they now go through correction.

S. He ends above the Parsa and he also includes the will to receive or he has none?

R. It has all the parts that should also be below the Parsa, however it raises them above the Parsa and it corrects them there, until the end of correction. In the end of correction, once they’re all corrected above the Parsa, then they can also come down from above the Parsa to below the Parsa, and then the world of Atzilut extends all the way down to the point of this world.

S. What does it mean that he receives from the new MA his complete correction?

R. It receives the correction, the vessels, in which it can receive all the lights, all the bestowals. Okay, let’s read more. It will soon become clear.

Item # 118 (06:39) “The reason for it is that each lower Partzuf returns and fills the vessels..”

3. S. (08:54) What does the world of correction correct?

R. The world of correction takes all the broken vessels that were broken in the Gadlut in the world of Nekudim. If we will correct these Kelim, we will correct the whole reality, so the world of Atzilut must perform this correction. It takes the broken vessels and it sorts them, and it elevates them to correction. This is why the world of Atzilut is called the world of correction.

S. So the world of Atzilut corrects or do we correct?

R. It is the same, it is the same. We correct, or the world of Atzilut. In fact, of course it is not us, but we are involved in it. We have to ask and awaken the correction. And the correction is done by the light that reforms.

4. S. (10:18) In the Gadlut of the world of Nekudim the Parsa is canceled. When is it renewed? In the Gadlut of the world of Nekudim the Parsa is canceled. When is it renewed again? Because the world of Atzilut is made above the Parsa?

R. The world of Atzilut is for and above the Parsa and the three worlds of BYA are below the Parsa and they have to participate with the world of Atzilut by raising the vessels to him by joining him as in AHP. Then the Atzilut with this AHP reaches Gadlut and by this he places all of the vessels correctly. That from Tabur of AK and until the Sium of all of the degrees, there they will all stand in a state called, “their legs are straight”.

S. Yes, but prior to the shattering in the world of Nekudim the Parsa was cancelled and then the world of Nekudim broke.

R. Yes.

S. So after that it is clear that the Parsa is made again that the world of Atzilut and Nekudim will be together when does it mean again or was it never canceled.

R. The Parsa needs to exist and we maintain it in every single Zivug. We sought the vessels, we correct the vessels, we place them correctly, and the Parsa is always kept.

5. S. (12:24) What is the difference between the new MA and the old MA?

R. The difference between new MA and the old MA isn’t that that the old MA was in Katnut, in the Gadlut that shattered and when we keep it then again it goes back to the correct Katnut. Meaning that according to the need of the vessels he reaches Gadlut. It is hard to imagine this, to describe it in one sentence.

6. S. (13:25) Are there limitations in the world of Atzilut? Are there any limitations there?

R. Of course there are limitations, because we exist from the condition, “in order to bestow,” from the desire to receive it still exists in an uncorrected way, it is only partially corrected, so of course there is exile.

7. S. (13:53) You answered this question.

R. The world of correction enables all of the vessels to participate in Katnut and Gadlut according to the limitations of the Parsa being maintained.

8. S. (14:18) How’s the connection with AHP made? What enables the right connection with AHP?

R. The correct connection is that the AHP will join GE and that it will not be independent, let’s say, if you can say that, that it will work only as AHP of the ascent.

9. S. (14:57) What will happen to the Parsa in the final correction?

R. In the final correction the Parsa goes down to the point of this world.

10. S. (15:14) Why Gadlut of Nekudim could’t elevate the desires of the phase four to the correction and by that to prevent the shattering?

R. Again.

S. Why the Gadlut of Nekudim could’t raise the desires of phase four to correction gradually and by that prevent the shattering?

R. How could that be, Behina Dalet can’t rise. I don’t understand how it’s possible.

11. S. (16:03) About the world of Atzilut it is just like Nekudim but because the coarseness is different it’s as if everything that is done there in that place is completely different. How come the light that comes in different courses causes all the system to change even though it’s in the same place?

R. Try again.

S. In the world of Nekudim there was a Zivug in the GE there was a certain structure of the world of Nekudim. In the world of Atzilut there is a Zivug in the Metzach and there’s a completely different system that functions.

R. But it doesn’t matter. Later on she receives the Reshimot of the Gadlut and therefore she can compare herself with everything that was before her.

S. How can it be that there is light in less coarseness and in the same place, in the same infrastructure, same hardware something completely different this time?

R. That is what I answered you.

S. So I didn’t understand.

R. It doesn’t matter what it was, it matters what it will be, that it will have desires, Reshimot, that will fulfill all of their previous vessels, correct them, and fulfill them. The world of Atzilut is called the world of correction, and it corrects all of the shattered vessels.

12. S. (17:58) When the world of Atzilut sorts out the broken parts of the Nekudim what is doing it with him? What does it mean that it corrects them, what’s that action?

R. He joins to them, he adds to his vessels, the vessels of the world of Nekudim.

S. What does it mean, he joins?

R. Joins meaning like you see someone who is enjoying an apple and then you also want an apple.

S. And why can I correct the apple and the Nikudim as someone else just asked that it was the same place exactly why couldn’t it correct and I can?

R. He does not have the vessels but you do.

S. Where did I get the vessels from?

R. From the beginning. So like a baby asking her mother for an apple so she can bring him an apple and he himself cannot get one.

S. But where does Atzilut get the wisdom and the ability to overcome things that Nekudim couldn’t?

R. How to put it in the easier way, Atzilut is actually like Galgalta. That is it. And then he can correct everyone, only in his place but in his place, when he begins to correct, then he has vessels and lights, he can correct.

S. Can I ask where does it get from?

R. Where? From being able in Katnut to be included in everyone and in Gadlut to work with what he received in Katnut to work with his vessels in Gadlut.

13. S. (20:50) Can Atzilut correct everyone but its in its own place?

R. Yes.

S. What does it mean but in its own place? Is it a condition or what that?

R. He cannot raise them above Tabur.

S. In order to receive corrections in Atzilut do you have to come to its place? In order to receive corrections. You said that Atzilut can correct everyone, but in its place. That means that in order to receive corrections from Atzilut, you have to come to its place. What does it mean to come to its place, what is that condition?

R. It is a condition when the conditions of the corrections of the vessels is like what Atzilut determines. That it’s only AHP of ascent first of all.

S. What is in the essence?

R. That we do not work with the correct vessels, with the real vessels of reception but only with the vessels of reception that we collect and raise only for the sake of the ascent.

14. S. (22:25) What is the difference between the force that is received to rise to Atzilut and the correction that is done there. In order to rise to Atzilut, you need some something has to happen.

R. The vessels need to join the AHP of Atzilut.

S. And what gives them this force to join the AHP of Atzilut.

R. That they are annulled towards Atzilut and they begin to rise.

S. But this force is not yet the correction, right? They receive some force on the account of Atzilut on account of whom does it come from? Where does the force that elevates them above come from? It’s not that they received the correction so that they can rise to the place of Atzilut. What I’m trying to understand is what is the difference between the process that the vessel went through in order to raise to Atzilut and what happens to it when it’s there already?

R. What does it mean to raise to Atzilut from BYA?

S. Yes, we say that all the vessels have to rise to the place. Meaning you can correct the vessels that are in its place. Meaning they have to rise to Atzilut. So in order to rise Atzilut there has to be a correction for the vessels or a force that elevates them containing them in Atzilut even though they can’t be there it’s not yet their place or their not in a correction in order to be in a place of Atzilut?

R. I do not understand. Again.

S. What’s the lever that helps the vessels rise to Atzilut?

R. AHP of Atzilut includes in it in it’s AHP. it includes vessles and raises them above Parsa and there it corrects them.

S. So it’s Atzilut helping the vessels to rise to it.

15. S. (25:08) Can we say that Atzilut works with the Rosh of the vessels, with the intentions?

R. Yes, with the intentions.

16. S. (25:29) Basically it’s the same question but you said that the vessels may rise to the world of Atzilut from the worlds ABYA only when they have the intention of bestowal already?

R. Yes, when they are annuled towards Galgata in Ima of Atzilut then that is how they rise.

S. So if they already have the intention in order to bestow is there another process of correction in the world of Atzilut.

R. They need to get the lights that correct their AHP and then in such a way they can participate in the general correction.

S. So the first step, the rise to the world of Atzilut is annulment?

R. Yes.

S. And once they are in the world of Atzilut they already receive the force to bestow?

R. Yes.

17. S. (26:28) What lights are there in the world of Atzilut?

R. Lights in the world of Atzilut there is everything.

S. There is the light of Hokma?

R. Everything.

S. But we said below Tabur there is no Hokma?

R. For the sake of correction, there is.

18. S. (26:50) A question about item 118, he writes that the reason that every lower Partzuf comes back and fills the vessels of the upper one. It also says that it refilled the empty vessels of the upper one. Can you can you please help us understand how can it be?

R. What?

S. That upper one has no strength to work but the lower one has strength to work with these vessels?

R. The lower vessel [reading 118]. So what are you asking?

S. I’m asking in the beginning of 118 he writes that the lower Partzuf fills the empty vessels of the Guf of the upper one. So im asking how can it be that the upper one has no strength to work with these vessels but the lower one does have the strength to work with these vessels?

R. It is the matter of Reshimot.

S. But if the upper one has no strength, where does the lower one get the strength?

R. From above. Everyone receives strength from above.

S. So why doesn’t the upper one work with the vessels that the lower his lower one works with?

R. He didn’t have such Reshimot; it wasn’t demanded from him.

S. As we read about Partzuf Aleph there’s four over four Dalet Dalet does it include three over four Gimel Dalet what AHP has?

R. No, it reveals only the greatest Reshimot the greatest deficiency not the small ones that include the main deficiency.

S. To what degree does it work? When we saw that in the world of Atzilut in the souls they only cancel themselves they do not make the correction, the Atzilut does the work, AHP of Atzilut elevates his souls to his place. So there is not the same rule where the lower one fills the vessels of the Guf of the upper one?

R. That usually happens in the cascading of the worlds and the Partzufim. In here, we are talking about preparing for the ascent.

19. S. (30:49) If I understand correctly the world of Atzilut and the world of Beria correct the ten sefirot of the world of Nekudim that broke. They are established in their place.

R. Because the world of Nekudot is their upper one and when it shutters they come out as a result of their shattering so they have to correct the shattered vessels and fulfill them with lights.

S. And the world of Atzilut is placed between the Parsa and the Tabur and BYA places itself below the Parsa.

R. Yes.

S. And then what the work is unable from below upwards. Meaning, the created being determines the conditions of the work, rather than receiving them from above.

R. Yes.

S. And then all the correction is done when the world of Nekudim is corrected then the world of ABYA are corrected through Atzilut. Is this correct?

20. S. (32:08) I’m looking at the principle difference between the world of Nekudim and the four worlds of Atzilut and BYA. Seemingly the shattering was because the world of Nekudim was one and it could not cope with the desires of the lower ones. There was a shattering and now these are different worlds and that is why the right coupling can be done rather than the wrong desires rising to Atzilut?

R. I understand you It is possible that you could say it like that.

S. Previously the world of Atzilut is the new MA but it is also BON. How can we explain that?

R. It includes it in it. It includes it in it.

21. S.(33:15) Maybe this question is trivial, it says that the screen elevates and brings down, so what is it in the screen that causes it to act as a force?

R. Reshimot. Reshimot.

22. S. (33:45) When the friends in the ten are meeting and they read the writings at the sages, are they activating the lights from the world of Atzilut?

R. Yes, yes.

S. Are there any other actions we can do in order to draw the light from Atzilut? Like a Congress of different event?

R. We will learn more about such actions, yes, more actions. The entire Torah explains to us how to attract the lights from Atzilut.

23. S. (34:42) The correction initiated then when we pray for the force to serve the Creator unconditionally, or the strength to serve the Creator unconditionally, is this the prayer the initiation point?

R. Yes.

24. S. (35:33) He writes that in the degree of MA that came out of the Metzach in the coupling, the new coupling in the degree of MA that came out of Metzach as a result of that coupling he feels the empty vessels of the Guf of the upper one, which are the vessels of Nekudim. What lights does it fill it with? The lights of its own coarseness, right?

R. With the of Aviut of himself he fills the Aviut of the upper one.

S. What does that mean?

R. It is like giving from your own money to an ice cream salesman and you get ice cream to give to your baby. That’s it. Here it is all very simple.

S. So that same vessel is filled with the light again? Only it’s relative part not everything.

R. Correct.

25. S. (36:40) He says that the departure of the lights from Guf of AB because of the refinement of the screen. So, there was a new coupling in the degree of SAG. How did the lights depart? Why do they depart? Why should they depart for the coupling?

R. Because there is no one to receive them. Whoever wants them in order to bestow.

S. What does it mean? What are these lights that depart?

R. The lights that clothe in the Partzuf in order to fulfill it.

S. They are there different kinds of lights?

R. I’m not going to start now.

S. No, just a question about if there are different kinds of lights?

R. Yes. NRNHY we have learnt that.

Reading item # 119 (37:50) “Yet, there is an essential difference here in the new MA..” twice

26. S. (42:40) We don’t call the world of Nekudim when we name the worlds because it broke, but basically the whole correction is to sort out its vessels?

R. Yes.

S. And that’s the only thing that happens there? The world of Atlizut sorts out and corrects?

R. And here in its place, seemingly, yes.

27. S. (43:13) Can we maybe say that from the perspective of the system until the new world of MA, it’s static. The Partzufim can only give birth to a lower Partzuf, but the world can move like an elevator up and down, and if I understand correctly because the new MA in it’s Gatlut can raise the vessels to correction, that’s why it’s he calls it male because it comes to correct, to bestow. Is this the right way to look at it?

R. Yes.

28. S. (43:55) Basically we never mentioned the correction of the world of the Nekudim. When we work in the world of correction, we do work for the world of correction, for the world of Atzilut, we say that it rises to Ein Sof?

R. The world of Atzilut to Ein Sof.

S. Exactly and there’s this manner of the work, the transition between ZA and Malchut and the connection that they have to be together in the correction ZON, there’s not much of a separation between them and it’s not clear.

R. They have to work together. They have to work together

29. S. (44:53) Half of the answers you gave previously were of Reshimot what is it like a default name for –

R. Reshimot are like a storage place.

S. I mean it’s like the future destiny and everything like whatever you cannot control that’s Reshimot? It’s a general name for what?

R. Reshimot are an impression on everything on the lights, the vessels, on everything that took place in previous states. And part of these states disappear, shatter, and something is left of them, it’s like going into a mechanic’s shop and seeing all kinds of leftover parts of cars and motor parts and so on, and from all of that you can put together good cars, you have good hands. That’s it.

S. So every time you don’t want to say Creator you say Reshimot and that’s enough?

R. No, the Creator is above the Reshimot, the records, without the Creator the records will only be an impression of what there could be.

S. Yes, but these things I can’t touch them, they just awaken and that’s it. My work is to do something with them and what awakens is not about you. These records are situations.

R. Reshimot are records from the previous states that you do awaken them. You awaken them, and they rise and push you to fulfill them, the places that require correction.

S. So Egypt is Reshimot, Pharaoh is Reshimot, all the rest are Reshimot, you could say it this way.

R. All these are Reshimot, except for the Creator.

S. So what’s the difference?

R. The difference is that you have Reshimot, records, on different degrees.

S. Records, you said the records in different degrees, so it’s the records everything is.

R. That you need to arrange them and they will be integrated and influence one another, so that eventually parts that are interdependent will form, like live bodies are built of atoms and molecules, bodies that have life of their own.

S. Yes, okay, so these atoms are awakened, but I didn’t control them. I didn’t decide what happens to them, that’s the whole thing, these records are are all the things I have no touch or control over.

R. There isn’t any control or some kind of touch but you are in included of them whether you like it or not, whether you like it or not you’re included of the entire world of all the Reshimot, and that is why we learn here in what way we can awaken them all in all our work is to participate, to participate in some small way and awakening of the shattered vessels towards correction. That’s how it is. It’ll come.

31. S. (49:17) What does it mean to revive them, to sort them out, and to raise them up?

R. To revive them is to give them some light so they would be like alive in some response, to raise them to the degrees that they themselves can continue these upper lights, and also to sort them and to correct them, and to be included in them, and then through all these actions that the Reshimot they will begin to be unified and correct themselves and connect themselves in the right direction.

32. S. (50:19) I had the same question I thought maybe it’s Ibur in … Mochin?

R. …  are three degrees where it’s already clear what needs to be done. Here, it is prior to the scrutiny.

33. S. (50:40) He writes about the world of Nekudim that there was a flaw in the vessels when the force of the ending Malchut was mingled with the posterior vessels of ZAT, what does that mean? That the force of the ending Malchut, which is the flaw, was mixed with the posterior vessels of ZAT, what was lacking there?

R. Lacking there? A Masach, a screen. In order to correct these vessels and to bring the light in order to bestow.

S. But there was a force missing from above, that’s clear. But what in the vessel didn’t enable it, didn’t ask?

R. In the Kli there was a deficit of the recognition of evil. They couldn’t discover, they couldn’t find where the evil is hiding, it’s concealed.

34. S. (52:00) Many times it’s written that the vessels broke and fell and died as if they went through three processes a lot of times. now the world of Atzilut it enables them to revive them to sort them and to raise them as if the correction of the shattering is by sorting, what does that mean – the sorting?

R. The light comes from above, sorts the shattered vessels, because in light you can locate to what level of correction the Kli belongs.

S. And this is what corrects the shattering, the shattering it’s vessels of reception that are mingled, just to know where they are?

R. It’s not enough just to know, you need to sort the vessels and the lights and the Reshimot, and to see how they can be arranged.

35. S. (53:17) What does it mean to raise them?

R. To raise them is to correct them.

S. To give them the right intention?

R. Yes, that is what an ascent is.

36. S. (53:36) You told the friend that the Reshimot is like a garage for building a car. You can use it to build something. So if we take the garage as an example, the car was, they took it apart in different pieces and now we have different pieces and we need to assemble them. So what do we do in this process because we’re talking about the relations between us, if you can explain?

R. First of all this carriage broke, now what you can sort from it in the first stage is initial stages that was done in the world of AK, what you can not find in this correction, in the sorting in the world AK is what remains in the world of ABYA, and in the world of ABYA, we have the order of correction, which is already through the incorporation of the vessels with the vessels. And that’s what we try to raise, not just Nekudim, the Nekudim is already the shattering, but in the world of the correction, after the shattering. So the work is by sorting, by raising the parts, according to the rest the correct order, and reassembling these parts according to the correct order, that is actually the corrections, everything is very logical and gradual.

S. You are describing it from the system, but what’s our work, and how do we take part in the sorting? How does the sorting out feel for us?

R.The scrutiny for us is felt by feeling ascents and descents, connections and shatterings, and by that, we sort all of these actions, that’s how we sort them, and then their corrections, in fact it is already in the world of Atzilut that parts of BYA are raised to Atzilut.

S. Let’s say it’s the middle of the day and I remember we studied and I want to go through this sorting out so I know that I have different desires some are about corporality, some spiritual, friends. So what can I do now and how can I sort them out?

R. That’s what we learn mainly from the Rabash articles. All the corrections can be learned only from there. All the corrections of ABYA, he tried to scrutinize them in his articles.

S. So there’s a very complicated system with many small parts, but I can’t work with them, I don’t know how to diagnose them, I don’t know if this is the part of the exhaust pipe, and this is the engine?

R. it is not given to you to scrutinize it according to your own mind, and to start sorting the parts like that like in a mechanics, and sort of like this or like that, it doesn’t work that way.

S. So what I can notice is that there is an action I could have done, action of connection, or physically take part and I didn’t do it and I’m trying to do it, to overcome, to connect, and out of that the system works in a much more complicated way?

R. No, no, no, no.

S. So how does it work? How do these two things coincide?

R. No, the system doesn’t come to confuse man, it comes to help man, to push him to the correct actions, to connect to the Creator, to connect to the friends, and to ask correction from the Creator.

S. So what’s the connection between the actions that we do when we try to realize the articles of Rabash in our society and this complicated system that we’re learning about now?

R. You won’t learn from these parts what you’re doing. If you think that you will now read Pticha or even TES and from that you will know how to use all the parts, that’s incorrect.

S. No, that’s not what I’m thinking. I’m asking what’s the connection between these two levels of action, what we learn from Rabash and this complicated system?

R. The articles of Rabash, they attract to you the light that reforms, and the light that reforms already works on you, and you from lesson to lesson you start penetrating more and getting more connected to all of these things, you possibly don’t feel to what extent you are involved and included in all this and to what extent you are in that same storage house of broken parts, how all of these parts influence you.

S. Something you have to reach?

R. It will come to an extent that you can annul towards the upper force. Towards the force of correction. You come to the mechanics and you start dictating to the owner there what to do and how to assemble it, and in what order, and how to correct the motor, and the car in general, and he’s telling you no, no, we’ll do it a different way, like this, like that, and here we have a problem.

S. Yes, on the other hand, I put my car in the garage and I tell the mechanic to take care of it and then I go. Here, it doesn’t work in this way, right?

R. If we would trust the Creator the way that we trust the mechanic, that would be good, if we would give him all the keys and then just move away that would be complete faith. We don’t want to be this way. We want to participate in correction.

S. So that wouldn’t be good? On the one hand you saying that it would be good to give the keys to the Creator, but then we’re not part of it, so it’s not good?

R. The fact that you give the keys, that’s also participation, and every time you need to make concessions, and make concessions, and in our work it seems that we have to do the corrections ourselves, there is some mixture there’s a mix up here, and we need to see how these two approaches integrate with one another.

37. S. (01:03:08) Baal HaSulam writes that anyhow the lower one becomes the new MA called BON, because it has been changed to BON. Why are Nekudot of SAG born from the world of Nekudim?

R. Nekudot of SAG?

S. Yes, they are born from the world of Nekudim.

R. Where are you getting this from?

S. I don’t know. If it’s not correct, tell me. If it is not correct, tell me.

R. We have GE AB SAG MA BON. Every Partzuf has Taamim, Nekudot, Tagin, Otiot. So the world of Nekudim is a world that exists and shattered as a result of the Partzuf of Nekudot of SAG. So what’s the question?

S. Are Nekudot of SAG Tzimzum Bet, in general?

R. Yes.

38. S. (01:04:40) All these sortings and arrangements there has to be a specific action done in order for them to be sorted or arranged, saying that connection does it by itself is not enough there has to be more, specific?

R. No, other than connection between us, we don’t need to do anything, everything else is as a result on the actions of correction.

39. S. (01:05:43) It is written that the new MA is born in order to correct the vessels of Nekudim, and also it is written that it is born in order to revive the past Partzufim which fell into BYA, so both of them, are they the same actions or different?

R. No, this is something different.

40. S. (01:06:40) I don’t understand why the previous Reshimot show us the shattering. Why does the light work this way? Why the light or the Reshimot revealed to us the … Why does the light work this way? Why do we reveal more fragmentations than corrections?

R. Because the lights are stronger and we can see in the stronger lights the more shattered vessels That’s how it always is. It’s the inverse value of lights and vessels.

S. Does it mean that when we advance there will be more fragmentation like we are going deeper and expanding?

R. Yes, correct.

41. S. (01:08:43) Are the hardest to correct to the desire is called the heart of stone are such desires in all the worlds or in the lowest world in the world Assiya only, where are they?

R. The vessels you’re referring to, they are spread out in all the worlds and in all the degrees, but when they are revealed, they are revealed in the most lowest states, the hardest to recognize, and locate, and to bring out towards correction.

S. So can we say that these desires, what we call the heart of stones, are the atoms and the molecules that you talked about, or am I incorrect?

R. You could say that. We’ll talk about it. For the time being, we don’t have a foundation for this.

42. S. (01:10:08) Can we accelerate the sorting and the rearrangement of the Reshimot through the prayer of many?

R. Of course we can through the prayer of many. We can accelerate the final correction, to bring it closer. Yes.

43. S. (01:10:49) Yesterday at the noon lesson you called everyone, and talked to everyone, you said that after the Congress you’ve received preparation to rise to the next spiritual degree, use it, and I hope that you will have a good ascent. So, how to use what we’ve received in the Congress in the right way towards the next degree?

R. There was good connection, good advancement, and good desire. It’s only a shame to lose it like the convention passed and we’re going back to our routine. We should make the routine today the awakening of yesterday, and by that to rise, and rise, and rise. It all depends on you.

S. What can we add today more with respect to tomorrow, etc?

R. Try and be closer to one another. Try and support, and help, and awaken. That’s what I mean. Otherwise, everyone will, at least half will fall or fade i,f not more. It’s as usual, it’s daily work. And don’t agree with seeing friends who are showing us their different forms of behavior which are not good, meaning and nevermind everything’s like this, it’s okay, we shouldn’t agree with this, we need to give them a kick to wake them up, to resuscitate them. I think we have to have this. It all depends only on the connection between us. What are you laughing at? It’s not a joke. A lot of people, thousands of people around the world, who are together with us and they see how we may be sometimes are not serious and aren’t triggered towards the goal, this has to awaken us and it has to concern us.

44. S. (01:13:41) How to turn the daily routine to something special because in the Congress there is some general inspiration that draws everyone and creates that spirit but what does it mean to take the Congress and to dress it on our daily routine? I don’t know how to call it, maybe to make the routine to a Congress, but how to insert the force of the Congress into our routine?

R. I don’t know exactly how you plan on doing this and what it actually means to put this in that and that and this, but I think we don’t need to enable our friends to be indifferent, to be calm.

S. That’s clear, is it just that the Congress shakes you, moves you, whether you want it or not, and routine has its own characteristic.

R. You’re telling me.

S. So that’s what I’m asking about how in our routine, our daily life, how to turn it to something powerful, how to turn our daily life to something?

R. It needs to be like electricity in the air, that we feel the awakening, the participation, electricity.

45. S. (01:15:30) But some friends have this electricity and some friends don’t. Some fall asleep.

R. So you need to add to those and remove from those. The society needs to organize a mutual state. I cannot do these things, you have to manage the general state and the individual state.

S. Can we reach that same volume of connection and impression that we had in the Congress today? Can we do it?

R. Of course.

S. In conditions that are not Congress?

R. Yes.

S. How?

R. What’s the difference?

S. When everyone’s together and we make the preparation?

R. Everyone will gather now, okay so what? It means what, that they all come to one place? No, that they all come, also not really. It all depends, it all should be every day as new. You need to do internal actions within each and every one so that people will understand that they need to be included together. There is no other work.

46. S. (01:17:49) Maybe we could say that the Congress was light we got from above, great pleasure, great connection, and now seemingly the Creator grows further, a little bit away. And now he gives us the opportunity to give an extra effort from below our work which is coming close to work with out any reward.

R. I don’t know. Okay, let’s say.

S. I’m trying to say that now it seems that it depends on us to awaken each other, to help each other, to support, to raise each other, and to give new importance after the congress?

R. Yes, that is correct, with that I agree with you 100%. Now, after the convention, there is work that points towards the importance of the convention that we experienced, yes.